Well, it’s Memorial Day, so for me that means the first grill cleaning of the year, as well as an endless supply of hot dog consumption. But, today it’s been scorching hot, so once the cleaning was done, I opted for two spicy chicken sausages, and threw two racks of ribs onto the Weber Smokey Mountain. Two racks should really require little more than use of the Performer, but I wanted to try out an idea.
The 22” smoker uses a lot of charcoal, simply because of the size of the charcoal ring that holds it all. One chimney’s worth of unlit briquettes underneath another’s worth of lit ones. It can hold 200* - 250* for HOURS, but when smoking just a little bit, it’s a big waste of Kingsford. So I wondered if I used a smaller ring, would I be able to use less but still keep consistent temps? Honestly, whatever I’ve done on it before was taken off with the charcoal being about 50-60% spent. Everything else just went to waste.
Hence, my mod:
I bought 8 little paver stones from Home Depot, at 88 cents a pop. No good old clay bricks available that day, but I may pick up one just to make the ring a bit more consistent. Either way, I figure I just saved maybe 25% of the charcoal I’d normally use. Two and a half hours in so far, and it hasn’t wavered off 250*. Sweet!
Monday, May 31, 2010
Wednesday, March 10, 2010
Sous Vide filets (I'm back!)
OK, it has been one week past a year since my last entry, embarrassingly enough. I’ve spent more time cooking and eating, rather than prepping and shooting. Since last March though, I’ve gotten an iPhone, which although not so great as a camera, is always on me. So, pics from here on out may not be perfect, but at least they’ll exist.
A few weeks ago a blog I read had an entry about the Sous Vide Supreme, a home-use sous vide appliance that allows perfect temperature control of a water bath, the idea being that whatever you want to cook goes into a vacuum-sealed bag and into the water, and whatever temp you want said food cooked at, that’s the temp you set the bath at. Then, no matter how long the food is left in, thanks to thermal physics the food will never hot hotter than the surrounding water. Can you cook a chicken? No, but you can do the parts. I preferred to start with some steaks – filet mignon, to be exact, as that is my favorite cut. However, the idea is to be able to produce a steak so tender, any cut will basically do.
You’ll have to pardon all the non-rotated pics – I have new blogging software (back on Mac, finally!) which doesn’t allow pic rotation, and the iPhone does a dandy job of not recording the data so the picture is presented properly in lots of software. Another time, perhaps.
The four filets prepped and in the bags, seasoned with just kosher salt and pepper on three of them (son doesn’t like pepper).
The steaks – 2 per bag – in the 4QT pasta pot.
I added hot tap water measuring about 120*, as I wanted the steaks to finish between 125* and 130*. Since the food is sealed in the bags, you don’t have to worry about how clean your tap water is (I know it’s very clean all things considered, but I also know to always use cold tap water, as the hot water tends to have more particulate in it).
Temperature probe in the front, with the pasta strainer on top to help keep the steaks from floating, as they must be totally submerged in the water. If the temp got above 130*, I’d just pour maybe 1/4 cup of cold water back into the pot to cool it down. After a few ours, I’d simply ladle out the water lest it get too close to the top of the pot. Easy enough to do, but it also meant never leaving the post
Although you can’t overcook, you’re not really sure when the steaks have actually come to temp. I kept them in there for two hours just in case. An hour probably would have been enough. The concept is that the entire cut of meat is at exactly the same temperature.
Here’s how the filets looked out of the bag. Not terribly pretty, and almost boiled-looking. At this point, some people take a blow torch to the steaks to get a nice sear on the outside.
I went with hot oil in a skillet. Could have used the grill I suppose, but this helped keep everything together on the stove. Next time I may use my cast iron pan, which after 2 years of use has gotten nicely seasoned and wouldn’t have required any oil.
Inside was absolutely some of the tenderest meat I’ve ever had, especially considering that it was bought at ShopRite, not exactly a foodie purveyor. I didn’t try cutting it with a fork, but I probably could have. I’d rank the texture up there with Lobel’s, my favorite steak place. The seasoning was just ever-so-slightly on the almost-too-much side... I subsequently read that the process does intensify spices and marinades, so next time I’ll use a little less. But the bite of the pepper and the zing of the salt worked perfectly together. Hardly an error was made on that front.
So, it ain’t grilling or BBQ, but it is low and slow, and the results were fantastic. The process though is boring and the maintenance of temps is constant. Instead of going for the home appliance, at $450, I instead decided on a $140 device that you plug a basic, cheapy slow cooker into, filled with water, and put the device’s temperature probe into the bath. When the temp goes higher than your setting, it shuts off the electricity to the cooker. When it falls below, it turns it back on. I can see using this for chicken, strip steaks, pork cuts, and fish – basically anything that I’d love to know I can grill reliably and perfectly, but that I also know I’m just a bit inconsistent with. It does take a bit more time than grilling, and you don’t have the fun of playing with fire, but you can still crack open a drink and sit outside while something else monitors the temps for you!
A few weeks ago a blog I read had an entry about the Sous Vide Supreme, a home-use sous vide appliance that allows perfect temperature control of a water bath, the idea being that whatever you want to cook goes into a vacuum-sealed bag and into the water, and whatever temp you want said food cooked at, that’s the temp you set the bath at. Then, no matter how long the food is left in, thanks to thermal physics the food will never hot hotter than the surrounding water. Can you cook a chicken? No, but you can do the parts. I preferred to start with some steaks – filet mignon, to be exact, as that is my favorite cut. However, the idea is to be able to produce a steak so tender, any cut will basically do.
You’ll have to pardon all the non-rotated pics – I have new blogging software (back on Mac, finally!) which doesn’t allow pic rotation, and the iPhone does a dandy job of not recording the data so the picture is presented properly in lots of software. Another time, perhaps.
The four filets prepped and in the bags, seasoned with just kosher salt and pepper on three of them (son doesn’t like pepper).
The steaks – 2 per bag – in the 4QT pasta pot.
I added hot tap water measuring about 120*, as I wanted the steaks to finish between 125* and 130*. Since the food is sealed in the bags, you don’t have to worry about how clean your tap water is (I know it’s very clean all things considered, but I also know to always use cold tap water, as the hot water tends to have more particulate in it).
Temperature probe in the front, with the pasta strainer on top to help keep the steaks from floating, as they must be totally submerged in the water. If the temp got above 130*, I’d just pour maybe 1/4 cup of cold water back into the pot to cool it down. After a few ours, I’d simply ladle out the water lest it get too close to the top of the pot. Easy enough to do, but it also meant never leaving the post
Although you can’t overcook, you’re not really sure when the steaks have actually come to temp. I kept them in there for two hours just in case. An hour probably would have been enough. The concept is that the entire cut of meat is at exactly the same temperature.
Here’s how the filets looked out of the bag. Not terribly pretty, and almost boiled-looking. At this point, some people take a blow torch to the steaks to get a nice sear on the outside.
I went with hot oil in a skillet. Could have used the grill I suppose, but this helped keep everything together on the stove. Next time I may use my cast iron pan, which after 2 years of use has gotten nicely seasoned and wouldn’t have required any oil.
Inside was absolutely some of the tenderest meat I’ve ever had, especially considering that it was bought at ShopRite, not exactly a foodie purveyor. I didn’t try cutting it with a fork, but I probably could have. I’d rank the texture up there with Lobel’s, my favorite steak place. The seasoning was just ever-so-slightly on the almost-too-much side... I subsequently read that the process does intensify spices and marinades, so next time I’ll use a little less. But the bite of the pepper and the zing of the salt worked perfectly together. Hardly an error was made on that front.
So, it ain’t grilling or BBQ, but it is low and slow, and the results were fantastic. The process though is boring and the maintenance of temps is constant. Instead of going for the home appliance, at $450, I instead decided on a $140 device that you plug a basic, cheapy slow cooker into, filled with water, and put the device’s temperature probe into the bath. When the temp goes higher than your setting, it shuts off the electricity to the cooker. When it falls below, it turns it back on. I can see using this for chicken, strip steaks, pork cuts, and fish – basically anything that I’d love to know I can grill reliably and perfectly, but that I also know I’m just a bit inconsistent with. It does take a bit more time than grilling, and you don’t have the fun of playing with fire, but you can still crack open a drink and sit outside while something else monitors the temps for you!
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)